Electromagnetic compatibility
Addresses electromagnetic emissions and immunity for equipment within its scope. An EMC document still needs the correct Product and model context.
Directive 2014/30/EU · official sourceTHE PRODUCT / INTELLIGENCE, IN CONTEXT
Every conclusion needs a source.
AI-powered import compliance intelligence for global trade. From a folder of documents to a product record you can inspect, question and act on.
Know the model.
Understand the evidence.
Megascopic brings identity, extracted specifications, target-market requirements and source relationships into one workflow. A manufacturer is not silently replaced by a Supplier. A document is not silently promoted to verified evidence.
Check a productInteractive product preview
Product intelligence01 / 07
CAM-X240Example Manufacturing · EU market
Start with the exact product.
CAM-X240 · Example Manufacturing · European Union. One identity anchors every relationship.
ONE CONNECTED WORKFLOWFrom upload
From upload
to an informed next step.
Eight steps around the same Product, model and sources. Explore the workflow through fictional examples, not live document analysis.
- 01
Upload
Bring photos, PDFs, a Product URL or several sources. Originals keep their own identity.
- 02
Identify
Separate Product families, exact models and revisions. Inspect where each candidate came from.
- 03
Review
Confirm critical facts and model scope. An extracted observation is not a confirmed Product field.
- 04
Assess
Screen recorded facts against the available EU rule set. Unknown applicability stays unknown.
- 05
Inspect Evidence
Connect a finding to the requirement, document, observed value and page reference.
- 06
Request
Ask the Supplier for the exact missing evidence. Carry the Product and model context with the request.
- 07
Reassess
Review the response and evaluate changed inputs. Retain the previous generation instead of overwriting it.
- 08
Report
Create an Internal or Shareable record of one saved generation, with its evidence and limitations.
THE EVIDENCE WORKSPACEInspect the relationship.
Inspect the relationship.
Not just the result.
Selected product CAM-X240. A sample report naming CAM-X210. The interface keeps both values, their source context and the next question visible.
Product / Evidence Intelligence FICTIONAL EXAMPLE
Product / Evidence Intelligence · fictional example
Outdoor Wi-Fi Camera
CAM-X240Example Manufacturing · Manufacturer
Sample Supplier · Supplier
Not assessed
OverviewRequirementsEvidence IntelligenceFindingsNext actions
Follow the claim to its source.
Requirement Evidence Finding Next action
01 / Requirements
Product identity
Product / model identityIdentity check · not a regulatory directiveEMC test evidence
Applicability not assessed
02 / Evidence & observations
CAM-X240_Datasheet.pdf
CAM-X210_EMC_Test.pdf
CAM-X240_User_Guide.pdf
Source observation · sample page 1CAM-X21003 / Finding & next action
Model coverage requires review
The report references CAM-X210. Applicability to CAM-X240 requires confirmation.
CAM-X240 CAM-X210
Ask Sample Supplier to confirm coverage.A model difference is not automatic legal non-compliance.02 / INTELLIGENCE YOU CAN INSPECTEvery finding.
Every finding.
Its evidence. Its next step.
Choose a point in the chain. See the source, the uncertainty and the action—without losing the product.
SELECTED / DOCUMENT
Inspect the source, not just the badge.
The sample report’s model-under-test field reads CAM-X210. There is no assertion here that the real manufacturer’s report is wrong.
CAM-X210_EMC_Test.pdf · sample page 1SOURCE CONTEXT · ILLUSTRATIVEModel under testCAM-X210Same context. No invented regulatory conclusion.
EU REQUIREMENTS / KNOW THE DISTINCTIONUseful context.
Useful context.
No automatic clearance.
These are different legal and documentary concepts, not interchangeable badges. Current screening is a deliberately limited v1 rule set; applicability depends on reviewed Product facts. It is not an exhaustive assessment of every EU obligation.
Radio equipment
The EU framework for radio equipment. Wireless functionality is relevant to screening, but recorded facts and scope still need review.
Directive 2014/53/EU · official sourceRestricted substances
Restricts certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. A linked file alone does not prove its contents or authenticity.
Directive 2011/65/EU · official sourceEU Declaration of Conformity
A manufacturer’s declaration for the applicable legislation and identified Product. It is a document to inspect, not a certification issued by Megascopic.
Example: EMC Article 15 / Annex IV · official sourceEMC and RED are not a checklist to apply indiscriminately to every wireless product. Available rule references and source observations are inspectable; unavailable normalized-rule ↔ legacy-check bindings remain unavailable.
EVIDENCE READINESSCoverage is a question.
Coverage is a question.
Compliance is not a score.
Readiness measures the coverage and quality of available evidence under the recorded assessment. Missing, conflicting and verification-pending evidence stay distinct. If a valid assessment projection is absent, readiness is unavailable—not a fabricated percentage.
Four states. Four different meanings.
Received
The document arrived with a receipt.
Linked
It has an explicit Product, model or requirement relationship.
Verified
Verification is recorded; it is not inferred from upload.
Supported
The relevant evidence relationship supports a requirement.
HISTORY / A RECORD OF WHAT CHANGEDA new generation.
A new generation.
Not a rewritten past.
Reassess changed inputs while retaining prior Product facts, evidence references and findings. Saved report fingerprints belong to their assessment generation.
Try the assessment workflowThe traceable record.
Source identities, observations and the working assessment context for your team.
The deliberate handoff.
An allowlisted summary. Private fields are not copied just because a report is exported.
A CLEARER PICTURE
Questions, answered.
Which inputs can I bring?
The existing intake workflow accepts supported images and PDFs, multiple sources and a Product URL. Confirm the exact model and source assignments before saving. Use the authenticated Check Product workflow for supported processing; marketing illustrations do not process uploads.
How does Megascopic handle conflicting model references?
Confirmed Product fields stay separate from source-observed values. A document naming a different model creates a coverage question when comparable observations support that finding. It does not establish fraud, failed compliance or automatic applicability.
Are regulatory references and reports complete legal assessments?
No. The current deterministic rule set and recorded references are deliberately limited. Normalized rule-to-legacy-check bindings can remain unavailable. Reports summarize the selected generation; material limitations and missing sources stay visible.